 
          115
        
        
          
            Plant diversity effect on horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands (HSSF-
          
        
        
          
            CWs): Are two species better than one?
          
        
        
          M. Rodríguez, J. Brisson
        
        
          Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale, Université de Montréal. 4101 East, Sherbrooke St,
        
        
          Montreal (Quebec), H1X 2B2 CANADA.
        
        
        
          
            Introduction
          
        
        
          Under the context of constructed wetlands, it has been hypothesized that plant polycultures
        
        
          could be more efficient than monocultures, by means of functional complementarity (Zhang
        
        
          et al. 2010). Assuming that a monoculture of species A is better than species B for pollutant
        
        
          removal (A>B), how will the combination of the two species AB perform? Will AB
        
        
          perform as well as the best monoculture (AB=A>B)? Or will it outcompete the
        
        
          monocultures (AB>A>B), supporting the hypothesis that plant diversity improves pollutant
        
        
          removal?
        
        
          
            Phragmites australis
          
        
        
          and
        
        
          
            Phalaris arundinacea
          
        
        
          are commonly used species for wastewater
        
        
          treatment with complementary traits (root system arrangement and seasonality) (Vymazal
        
        
          et al. 2005). Based on the differences between the two species, we evaluated if the
        
        
          combination of plant species influences the efficiency of pollutant removal in HSSF-CWs.
        
        
          The aim of our study is to answer the question: Are two species better than one?
        
        
          
            Methods
          
        
        
          
            Experimental set-up:
          
        
        
          Sixteen mesocosm scale experimental constructed wetland units
        
        
          were set-up in a controlled greenhouse environment and evaluated for 12 months (Jul.
        
        
          2012-Jul. 2013). Each experimental unit consisted of two coupled mesocosms (L 70cm W
        
        
          51cm H 36cm), respectively planted according to each of the following four treatments:
        
        
          monocultures of
        
        
          
            P. australis
          
        
        
          (AA) and
        
        
          
            P. arundinacea
          
        
        
          (BB) and the combination of the
        
        
          two plant species,
        
        
          
            P. australis
          
        
        
          followed by
        
        
          
            P. arundinacea
          
        
        
          (AB), as well as
        
        
          
            P. arundinacea
          
        
        
          followed by
        
        
          
            P. australis
          
        
        
          (BA) (Fig.1). Experimental units were divided into two separate
        
        
          mesocosms to avoid one species dominating the polycultures. Each treatment was
        
        
          replicated four times following a randomized block design. The mesocosms were filled
        
        
          with granitic river gravel (10-15 mm diameter). Following a period of plant establishment,
        
        
          the experimental units were fed from Apr. 2012 with 15 L d
        
        
          1
        
        
          of reconstituted wastewater
        
        
          from diluted fish farm sludge, at a hydraulic loading rate of 42 L·m
        
        
          −2
        
        
          ·d
        
        
          −1
        
        
          . Average influent
        
        
          concentration (in g·m
        
        
          −2
        
        
          ·d
        
        
          −1
        
        
          ) was TSS 8.2; COD 14.3; PO
        
        
          4
        
        
          -P 0.6; NH
        
        
          4
        
        
          -N 1.1. The
        
        
          temperature of the greenhouse ranged from 35ºC in summer to 5ºC in winter.