176
La cuenca del río Usumacinta
desde la perspectiva del cambio climático
Brown, C. y J. King (2003). “Environmental flows: concepts and
methods”. En:
Water resource and environment Technical
Note
1. Davis, R. y R. Hirji (Eds.) The International Bank
for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Washington DC.
Conagua (Comisión Nacional del Agua) (2014).
Statistics on
water in Mexico
, National Water Commission, México.
Cloquell-Ballester, V .A., R. Monterde-Díaz, V. A. Cloquell-
Ballester & M. C. Santamarina-Siurana (2007). “Systematic
comparative and sensitivity analyses of additive and
outranking techniques for supporting impact significance
assessments”,
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
27:
62-83.
Cohen, S. J. (2010). “From observer to extension agen-using
research experiences to enable proactive response to
climate change”,
Climatic Change
, 100: 131-135.
De la Maza, J. y J. Carabias (2011).
Usumacinta. Bases para una
política de sustentabilidad ambiental
, Instituto Mexicano de
Tecnología del Agua-Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos, A.
C., México.
De Smedt, P. (2010). “The use of impact assessment tools to
support sustainable policy objectives in Europe”,
Ecology
and Society
15(4): 30.
Dyson, M., G. Bergkamp y J. Scanlon, J. (2003).
Flow
, Editorial
UICN, UK.125 pp.
Fischer, S. y H. Kummer (2000). “Effects of residual flow and
habitat fragmentation on distribution and movement
of bullhead (Cottus gobio L.) in an alpine stream”,
Hydrobiologia
, 422/423:305-317.
FISRWG (Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working
Group) (1998).
Stream corridor restoration principles,
processes, and practices
, USA Government.
